Osseointegration Dynamics: Insights into the Dental Bone-Implant Interface

Authors

  • Sirus Safaee Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Japan¬
  • Mahdis Nesabi Department of Dental and Biomedical Materials Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Japan
  • Mahyar Nesabi Department of Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz; Iran.
  • Faezeh Mamizad Moghtader Department of Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz; Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22034/JATE.2023.85

Abstract

The interface between a bone and an implant, referred to as the bone-implant interface (BII), plays a critical role in determining the success and long-term stability of dental implants. This comprehensive review delves into the various factors that influence the BII. The design of the implant and the treatments applied to its surface are fundamental factors that affect both the contact between the bone and the implant and the overall integration. Mechanical forces, such as compression and tension, have an impact on the integrity of the BII, while biological factors, including bone quality and growth factors, play a crucial role in orchestrating the healing process. Molecular mechanisms, involving cells like osteoblasts and osteoclasts, as well as signaling molecules, are essential for the process of osseointegration. Additionally, cell therapies, particularly Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) show promise in enhancing the healing of the BII. these factors and exploring innovative techniques are of utmost importance for improving the outcomes of implant procedures and enhancing patient care in the field of implant dentistry. Continued research in these areas is set to advance our knowledge of osseointegration and its optimization, ultimately shaping the future of implantology.

References

Grzeskowiak RM, Schumacher J, Dhar MS, Harper DP, Mulon PY, Anderson DE. Bone and Cartilage Interfaces with Orthopedic Implants: A Literature Review. Front Surg. 2020 Dec 21;7.

Hériveaux Y, Nguyen VH, Haïat G. Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Bone-Implant Interface. In 2022. p. 373–96.

Lian Z, Guan H, Ivanovski S, Loo YC, Johnson NW, Zhang H. Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;39(7):690–8.

Gao X, Fraulob M, Haïat G. Biomechanical behaviours of the bone–implant interface: a review. J R Soc Interface. 2019 Jul 31;16(156):20190259.

Shah FA, Thomsen P, Palmquist A. Osseointegration and current interpretations of the bone-implant interface. Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan;84:1–15.

Puleo D. Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interface. Biomaterials. 1999 Dec;20(23–24):2311–21.

Jain R, Kapoor D. The dynamic interface: A review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(5):354.

Mohamed Darwish Elsayed. Biomechanical Factors That Influence the Bone-Implant-Interface. Res Rep Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;3(1).

Hanawa T. Titanium–Tissue Interface Reaction and Its Control with Surface Treatment. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Jul 17;7.

https://www.nobelbiocare.com/en-int/blog/science/dental-implant-surface-treatments-what-you-need-to-know [Internet]. Dental Implant Surface Treatments: What You Need to Know.

Zafar MS, Fareed MA, Riaz S, Latif M, Habib SR, Khurshid Z. Customized Therapeutic Surface Coatings for Dental Implants. Coatings. 2020 Jun 17;10(6):568.

https://periobasics.com/dental-implant-surface-treatments [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 27]. Dental implant surface treatments. Available from: https://periobasics.com/dental-implant-surface-treatments/

Cervino G, Meto A, Fiorillo L, Odorici A, Meto A, D’Amico C, et al. Surface Treatment of the Dental Implant with Hyaluronic Acid: An Overview of Recent Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4670.

Al Mugeiren O, Baseer M. Dental implant bioactive surface modifiers: An update. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(1):1.

Priyadarshini B, Rama M, Chetan, Vijayalakshmi U. Bioactive coating as a surface modification technique for biocompatible metallic implants: a review. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 2019 Oct 2;7(4):397–406.

Colnot C, Romero DM, Huang S, Rahman J, Currey JA, Nanci A, et al. Molecular Analysis of Healing at a Bone-Implant Interface. J Dent Res. 2007 Sep 20;86(9):862–7.

Jain R, Kapoor D. The dynamic interface: A review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(5):354.

Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991 Jan;2(1):24–9.

Stadlinger B, Pilling E, Huhle M, Mai R, Bierbaum S, Bernhardt R, et al. Influence of extracellular matrix coatings on implant stability and osseointegration: An animal study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 Oct;83B(1):222–31.

Becker K, Stauber M, Schwarz F, Beißbarth T. Automated 3D–2D registration of X-ray microcomputed tomography with histological sections for dental implants in bone using chamfer matching and simulated annealing. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 2015 Sep;44:62–8.

Hong JM, Kim UG, Yeo ISL. Comparison of three-dimensional digital analyses and two-dimensional histomorphometric analyses of the bone-implant interface. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276269.

Kowalski J, Lapinska B, Nissan J, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Factors Influencing Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Narrative Review. Coatings. 2021 Jul 19;11(7):865.

Boyan BD, Kinney RC, Singh K, Williams JK, Cillo Y, Schwartz Z. Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Other Bone Growth Factors. In: Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2008. p. 225–45.

Seyed Hadi Hosseini1 MK, SG. A brief overview of cellular and molecular mechanisms of osseointegration. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews. 2015;2015.

Salamanna F, Del Piccolo N, Sartori M, Giavaresi G, Martini L, Di Sante G, et al. Effects of Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Platelet-Rich Plasma on Bone Regeneration and Osseointegration of a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Titanium Implant. Coatings. 2021 Jul 12;11(7):840.

Brånemark PI HBARBULJHOOA. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

Hong JM, Kim UG, Yeo ISL. Comparison of three-dimensional digital analyses and two-dimensional histomorphometric analyses of the bone-implant interface. PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276269.

Barfeie A, Wilson J, Rees J. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration. Br Dent J. 2015 Mar 13;218(5): E9–E9.

Fu J, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Du J, Xu J, Liu Y. Systemic therapy of MSCs in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 Dec 2;12(1):377.

Safaee S, et al. Fabrication of bioactive glass coating on pure titanium by sol-dip method: Dental applications. Dent. Mater. J. 2021; 40: 949–956.

Nesabi M, et al. A novel multi-structural reinforced treatment on Ti implant utilizing a combination of alkali solution and bioactive glass sol. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021; 124: 104837.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-24

How to Cite

Safaee, S., Nesabi, M., Nesabi, M., & Mamizad Moghtader, F. . (2023). Osseointegration Dynamics: Insights into the Dental Bone-Implant Interface. The Journal of Applied Tissue Engineering, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22034/JATE.2023.85

Issue

Section

Original Articles